Their would be an increase in holding of members if we got more tit pics hahaha.
What? The fg4 is nice looking car.ppl get older, buy new cars, join new forums. it's as simple as that
also, since the newer civics are ass ugly and simply blow, no one wants them
Haha that's awesome
^This. Not to mention the declining aftermarket support, or the crappy economy that is reducing the amount of free income to spend on our cars.ppl get older, buy new cars, join new forums. it's as simple as that
also, since the newer civics are ass ugly and simply blow, no one wants them
The people who stick around the forum tend to stay for the community, not civic tech
^This is why CC is dead. Members in the leadership role have little or no clue about Honda tech.every question that could be asked has been asked on this forum. A quick search reveals the answer. Done.
You can continue to hold a grudge from years ago, when you were on the staff, or you can move on from it and become an adult. Either way, I don't intend to argue with you regarding my naivety. If I am naive, I will be too naive to understand the illogical basis of my position. If I am not, I have no reason to force your beliefs toward the truth.^This is why CC is dead. Members in the leadership role have little or no clue about Honda tech.
In general, tech doesn't work in the overly simplistic way you have portrayed. From your naive point of view, there's a single solution for each car problem. In reality, there are multiple possible solutions and to find the right one, you need to troubleshoot. With few exceptions, nobody here teaches logical troubleshooting. The main blame for this dying forum points directly at the poor shortsighted and neglected leadership at this site. Done.
The life blood of a car forum is tech. Period.
Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/clubcivi/public_html/board/shoutbox/shoutshow.php on line 9
This^ is in itself a major problem. Somebody must be in charge. When I mention leadership, I of course also include Justin. Without somebody in charge, good ideas will often fail to get implemented.I have no power to approve or deny the will of other mods...site modifications are also beyond our control. There is nothing the mod staff can do to fix that error.
I've stated it in the past many times. Whether you like it or not, the main source of new membership for car forums is tech. There are many people on the internet with tech questions, so a paucity of potential new members is not the problem. Your attitude about tech and that of your like-minded moderators (see posts above) kill the source of new membership, which is the life blood of a car forum. You have also failed to recruit and keep new staff who understand tech or its importance. Instead, CC staff are composed nearly entirely of Off Topic forum posters, who lack either tech knowledge or the interest to participate in tech forums. CC needs at least an equal number of bona fide tech moderators as it does Off Topic moderators. The problem is that this recruitment effort should have been a constant high priority at CC long ago. It is probably too late now, especially when you consider that the current staff see Google as a better option for tech answers. CC staff fail to recognize that there's a gap that Google cannot fill but forums can - the need for people to ask specific questions and get answers.As always, if you have a way to boost activity (that we can actually enact), let us know and we'll get moving if it is feasible and other members seem to be behind it.
Taking credit for site successes would dictate the need also to take blame for site failures, so the reason for your avoidance of taking credit is obvious.it would be very convenient to say that I was the reason behind the site's success when the site was highly successful, wouldn't it?