soo youd rather pay out the rear for a STI thats not really that much ...the only way its better is its ability to corner and its AWD but other than that its nothing special
ehh im not gonna argue most ppl on here never even driven a fast car....
The STI will always be more car than the SRT can ever hope for, as a total package. People trying to compare STI to a freakin Neon is just plain ignorant. They are nothing alike, and not comparable.
I've driven the SRT4 and yes, it's damned fast. Especially modded.
But my old civic hatch whipped quite a few. My turbo civic was alot faster than my current WRX, too. Hell, my SR20DET-powered 240SX was alot quicker/faster than my WRX. And my WRX is Stg2, Enginuity engine mgmt, blah blah..
But come snow-time, it's show-time! Only car I've ever owned that seemed to handle better than my wrx, was my old '83 Audi Ur-Quattro.
[/threadjack]
The SRT is nice, man. I'm not totally 100% on the wheels, though.. or the tails.. but I do like the de-winged look.
My friend got a s**t ton of money when he turned 18 from an automobile accident from his childhood and bought a SRT-4 that was moderatly to heavily modded. Long story short, had it a week, it was on 25 psi and one night the tranney just plain shot apart, almost broke his leg when it threw the clutch pedal out.
: lol ill let you drivew it. 20 an hour