there are different races out there, but there are no pure races. your point was that there is a "pure white" race. there isn't. look at the definitions you posted. they all mention SIMILARITY, as did your conclusion. they share similar traits. this does not make a pure race. it is not homogeneous.
I couldn't see throw the screen that you were a WOMAN sorry!
I feel bad for you now. 
Minus 2 points for you. She's hot!I couldn't see throw the screen that you were a WOMAN sorry!
you may state there is no "pure white" race.. others will disagree.. your coment that we all lead back to one place in time is valid in the sense that we all originate as one type of being.. but time and enviorment have molded people differently... to say that a white european is different than an asian korean... there are tons of obvious differences.. "white people" generally look differently than "black people" its not relevant that at one point in evolution there were not black and white people, at this point in time there are..
but spanish is straight European tho isn't it? that would make them f**kers PURE white too, am I right?
I got banned for a few weeks over it.opinion has nothing to do with this bud. it doesn't matter if anyone agrees or disagrees. this is about facts. your examples are good for showing differences in race, but proves nothing in terms of the existance of a "pure race." all you need to do is to show us a purely homogenous population and you'll have proven race purity to the entire world. all races and local subracial types are the products of physical mixture.
spanish as in spanish from the country of spain? sure.. spanish as in south america is confusing because many are mixed with the natives of those south american nations..but spanish is straight European tho isn't it? that would make them f**kers PURE white too, am I right?
sigh..
i think you fail to understand the concept of what a pure race is. i'm not making up any definitions here. race, as defined in your dictionary copy/paste, is about similar traits and genetics. a pure race is one that is not similar, but 100% homogeneous. there are no pure races.sigh..
i guess you win since you are making up your own definition for the word race.. how can you argue with someone making up whatever definition they want..
sure you are.. there is not definition for "pure race" but if you put those two words together thats where im saying you are simply deciding what pure is.. when you look up the word race.. it means exactly what i posted.. so "pure race" regardless of what you think.. would be a race that is not "mixed" with another thus making it pure.. you can go on for days about how no one is "pure white" or pure whatever.. and im sure there will be countless people who will argue that point with you.. if you consider irish (for example) to be "white" than saying a %100 pure irish person is something other than %100 white is silly to me.. what are they white and asian? or maybe they are part black?
practical definition vs academic definition. i'm arguing purity as 100% homogeneous, and you're arguing purity as "no interbreeding with a distinctly different modern race."
haha only playing,
No way Trinidad & Tobago rocks...bake-n-shark + Carnival ftw!!
Yep, i go there every year to see family
it all came down to how we were defining pure race. i was using a pureply academic sociologist definition of pure race. anthony was using a more practical, modern definition of pure race. in the end, we were both correct.
