EVGA GTX 550 Ti (1GB 192-bit)
Core: 951 MHz
Memory: 4356 MHz
Shader: 1903 MHz
Processors: 192 processor cores
Price: $137
MSI Hawk Talon Attack GTX 460 (1Gb 256-bit)
Core: 810MHz
Memory: 3900 MHz
Shader: 1620 MHz
Processors: 336 processor cores
Price: $175 ($135 after mir)
It's pretty obvious the numbers show the 550ti is the faster card, but every review I read, chart I see, and etc... People keep saying the 460 is the more superior card. Does it have something to do with the processor cores? I mean, the more the better right? But does that play a big role in how much faster it can make the card run?
Oh yea, and one of the features of the MSI card is that there's PLENTY of room for overclock... I'm sort of feeling the MSI card now due to the fact it has a lot more processor cores, and there's still room for OC (most people get the core running around 900-920 on stock air cooling); plusss... After the mail in rebate, prices are right there with the 550ti.
So tell me, what do YOU guys think is the better card??