actually you're wrong. the OP said he wanted to keep it 4 cyl...You're all wrong.
Given the wording in the OP, the question is what is the cheapest motor to build up. The cost of the actual engine doesn't have to factor in and it doesn't say anything about it having to go in a Civic.
Therefore, I'm going with the J37A4
A: cheapest motor to build up ($0, 305hp bone stock)
B: Most reliable motor to build up (OEM reliability)
C: Overall best motor to build up (okay maybe this one doesn't apply)
(only honda motors)
If you want to argue that it's an Acura motor, not a Honda motor, well then…
Oh my bad i forgot to point out that it would be a turbo 4 cylinder honda motor of some sort
as cool as j swaps are that dont really interest me
I wasn't suggesting a k swap, it was a reference to the torque needed to be fast. Just because you can make a s**t ton more torque from a bigger motor, doesn't mean that the extra torque will even be useable in most situations. Just like people with massive horsepower numbers that can't get traction until 4th gear, its just pointlessHe was asking about an affordable swap
My only thing with H series (I know I forgot about it too ) is that parts are a little harder to find.
maybe it;s just me but i think high horsepower FWD vehicles are stupid. sure u can drive in a straight line. unless u torque steer into a tree. but asking the front wheels to deliver that much power and steer the car makes it just stupid for good handling.I wasn't suggesting a k swap, it was a reference to the torque needed to be fast. Just because you can make a s*** ton more torque from a bigger motor, doesn't mean that the extra torque will even be useable in most situations. Just like people with massive horsepower numbers that can't get traction until 4th gear, its just pointless
I thought race cars had very narrow powerbands?yeah its baller to make 400whp and only 250ft lbs of torque at 8200rpms
The goal of a well built engine is to have a wide usable powerband, thats what wins races and puts down great ETs.
To answer the OPs question like several others already have, any b/d/k/h/j/f/g can be reliable AND fast when built properly. High horsepower N/A builds are not a good idea for daily purposes, because of the aggresive cams and high octane needed to achieve such number as to be considered "fast". I hear the argument that N/A is better because of no boost lag. If you b**** about boost lag you 1-Have not driven a properly built turbo car or 2- Do not know how to drive
I had thought so but i wasn't sure and didnt feel like searching dyno results to confirm. D's are more dope than people give them credit for. It's the american way, bigger is bettera D series at 300whp will usually make more torque than a B series at that same horsepower level. I know people are gonna read that and be like WTF
Its because it has a longer stroke. But, there is a point where the D series heads cant flow enough air and a b series will eventually make more power. We know this because we've done it. The most bad ass D series head you can think of only flows about the same as a stock GSR head.I had thought so but i wasn't sure and didnt feel like searching dyno results to confirm. D's are more dope than people give them credit for. It's the american way, bigger is better
overkill, OP doesnt need a 6265 to make 300whp
right and you gave an example which is fine, Im just saying a turbo that size is overkill, even for the setup on the other car.he said he wanted 300-350 hp...