10 worse Hondas

Mr.Baker

Mr. Search
Registered VIP
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
Top 10 worst Hondas' from Honda Tuning:

Bad cars are inevitable. Bad cars are necessary. If it weren’t for bad cars, then the good ones might not seem so good. Besides, counting down the list of Honda’s all-time best would be entirely too easy, not to mention entirely too labored a list. Consider these not so much the worst but perhaps the worst of the not-so-great. Some were underpowered. Some lacked proper styling. Some were engineering oddities. Either way, behold, the following are what may well be the 10 worst Hondas of all time, in no particular order.

1992 Acura Vigor: In a world of sophisticated VTEC engines—all of which had even numbers of cylinders—the Legend-like Vigor made do with the oddity that was Honda’s only longitudinally mounted five-cylinder powerplant.

1991 Acura NSX Automatic: Drive one and you’ll quickly realize that no amount of suspension finesse or supercar styling will make up for its slop-box full of clutches, gears, valve bodies, and other nonsense.

1990 Prelude Si 4WS: The world never has and never will require four-wheel steering.

1997 Acura CL 2.2: Heavier and slower than the Accord, Acura’s supposedly upper-echelon model was more expensive than its Honda ancestor yet featured dim performance and curious styling. Bits of its front fascia were also the basis of the 1990s California Integra Type R conversion and earns its place on this list if for no other reason than that.

2002 Civic Si: The first Si to not feature its respective era’s flagship four-cylinder Honda engine. It was also the first in 14 years to have its steering cumbrously connected to its struts and featured the lowest amount of shock travel of any Civic to date.

1994 Honda Passport: Designed by Isuzu. Built by Isuzu. Any questions?

1996 Acura SLX: It looked like an Isuzu Trooper…because it was one. At least one major automotive evaluation firm rolled one over during testing.

2005 Honda Accord Hybrid: When compared to non-hybrid Accords, it performed similarly, achieved marginally better fuel consumption, yet weighed and sold for significantly more.

1993 del Sol S: That Honda didn’t equip the roadster-like del Sol in the wake of Miata domination with an RWD configuration can be forgiven. That it offered a version with its least powerful SOHC 1.5L D series cannot.

2011 CR-Z: They claimed it was the spiritual successor to the late, great CRX. At 122hp, it wasn’t.


http://www.hondatuningmagazine.com/editorial/htup_1204_10_worst_hondas/index.html

Agree, disagree?
What would make your list AND why?
 

Avant Uprising

GONE FISHIN
Registered VIP
i agree with it all no arguing here.except for 2012 civic looks like a damn corolla.
 


00siboy

lurkin...
Registered VIP
I haven't been in the game long enough to really offer any input, but the CRZ is definitely disappointing. Eibach corrected it though haha.
 

young_

out on bail
Staff member
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
1993 del sol S. That's my car, and yes the d15 sucks. lol
 


00siboy

lurkin...
Registered VIP
^^haha sucks to see your own car on the list huh? Didn't you say somewhere you wanted a different car already?
 

young_

out on bail
Staff member
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
^^haha sucks to see your own car on the list huh? Didn't you say somewhere you wanted a different car already?
Eh, it doesn't bother me too much. I knew when I bought it they weren't the most popular cars.
But yeah I'm looking for an accord. The del sol is fun, just not practical.

And it's beyond slow.
 

cgpEJ6

noob
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
It's clearly not the 10 worst Hondas, maybe the 10 most disappointing Hondas. The '02 Si was disappointing but still better than the all other 7th gens. The automatic NSX should have never been made but it's still an NSX and therefore better than a lot of cars. The 4th gen Civic sedan was a pretty horrible car, the Ridgeline sucks… You could do a lot worse than most of the cars on that list.
 

crash!

Avi, pull your socks up.
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
I agree with all but the CR-Z. It was a good idea by Honda and they're actually pretty popular at the dealership I work at.
They're great for the person who want s a little car to commute in that's also comfortable to drive. The only thing I have to say is that it has HORRIBLE blind spots.
Done right, I personally think they can look good but they're not fast by any means. Hence why HondaTuning is/was doing the KR-Z project ;)

And 7th gens just need to gfto.
 

Mr.Baker

Mr. Search
Registered VIP
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
It's clearly not the 10 worst Hondas, maybe the 10 most disappointing Hondas. The '02 Si was disappointing but still better than the all other 7th gens. The automatic NSX should have never been made but it's still an NSX and therefore better than a lot of cars. The 4th gen Civic sedan was a pretty horrible car, the Ridgeline sucks… You could do a lot worse than most of the cars on that list.
Disappointing is probably a more fitting word.
I get the Ridgeline and auto NSX.
Care to explain why the '02 Si and 4th gen Civic sedan was horrible?
Everyone can make open ended statements but what is important is the why.
As I said before....What would make your list AND why?
 

Avant Uprising

GONE FISHIN
Registered VIP
my first car was a 89 civic si hatch so that is my most favorite gen. and my last was a 91 lx sedan so to me i love em lol
 

crash!

Avi, pull your socks up.
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
ya just the acura vigor had a 5 cylinder kinda weird and not really spoken of
It's not super practical because it's not a very balanced motor since it's not symmetrical.
 

00siboy

lurkin...
Registered VIP
My list: (subject to change...)

1. 02 Si (and 7th gen in general) - because Honda took a break from the Si model for 96-98, then came out with one of the best Si's yet in 99-00. Then proceeded to choke themselves with the 7th gen completely.

2. All hybrids up til the CRZ. The CRZ is good for what it was made for, just not what enthusiasts like us wanted.

3. The Odyssey...all of them. Tranny problems, they suck to work on, and I hate minivans in general.

Opinions?
 

crash!

Avi, pull your socks up.
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
why does everything have to be symmetrical
I can't tell if thats a serious question or not?

My list: (subject to change...)

1. 02 Si (and 7th gen in general) - because Honda took a break from the Si model for 96-98, then came out with one of the best Si's yet in 99-00. Then proceeded to choke themselves with the 7th gen completely.

2. All hybrids up til the CRZ. The CRZ is good for what it was made for, just not what enthusiasts like us wanted.

3. The Odyssey...all of them. Tranny problems, they suck to work on, and I hate minivans in general.

Opinions?
1. Agreed wholeheartedly
2. Couldn't of put it better. However I think they look awesome slammed ;)
3. THIS.

Right.
Volvo has been successful and made it work.
Factory tuned with boost!
:what:
Didn't they do a funky design though? I don't know a ton about Volvos.
 


Top