S2000 Meets SRT-4

[munky]

i got a 404

 

[baby99si]

To pop-n-fresh you did make alot of good points but you were only worng about saying that inorder to make a honda 13 sec car it is way to expensive thats not true at all.86 crx 1000$ B16 swap with axels i/h/e ecu six puck clutch new fuel rail 5000$ dollars 1/4 time on "skinny street tires" 13.6 everything else i would agree wiht but i would still pick the S2000.

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by baby99si
To pop-n-fresh you did make alot of good points but you were only worng about saying that inorder to make a honda 13 sec car it is way to expensive thats not true at all.86 crx 1000$ B16 swap with axels i/h/e ecu six puck clutch new fuel rail 5000$ dollars 1/4 time on "skinny street tires" 13.6 everything else i would agree wiht but i would still pick the S2000.

for the same money you could swap a 4g63t into an early 90's hyundai accent and with minor mods run low 12's

i was talking about factory produced cars though.

 

[baby99si]

Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
for the same money you could swap a 4g63t into an early 90's hyundai accent and with minor mods run low 12's

i was talking about factory produced cars though.

Haha damnit well im going to argue but im sure ill lose you could get for cheaper a 91 hatch put a H22A in it and run 12's like that you may prove me wrong now.

 

[baby99si]

Oh my bad didnt even notice the factory car thing my bad

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by baby99si
Haha damnit well im going to argue but im sure ill lose you could get for cheaper a 91 hatch put a H22A in it and run 12's like that you may prove me wrong now.

it's been done, that swap from what i hear is REALLY hard. and i still hear that those cars runnin 13's... a good driver could make all the difference though.

the accent is about the same weight as 4th gen hatches and with the 4g63 you could pump out around 240 horsies with relatively minor mods.

 

[fast5thgen]

all that stuff is good and true but were still talking turbo vs NA, factory parts or not they are different animals-- if you take away the turbo the honda wins - usually w/less displacement and less tourqe

 

[brian]

srt-4 is not a neon. its a dodge sports car. and whats so bad about driving a neon, expecially when they are nice sleepers, grest suspensions, and look funny owning anything... how are you going to talk about driving a neon.. when you mod the same econobox honda.

dodge did it right, they owning everything for less money.

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by fast5thgen
all that stuff is good and true but were still talking turbo vs NA, factory parts or not they are different animals-- if you take away the turbo the honda wins - usually w/less displacement and less tourqe

only becuase of it's variable valve timing (vtec) which is another motor in itself... v.v.t./displacement/turbo/supercharger.. diff manufacturers use different technology to gain performance....... honda just hasnt come to the darkside of turbo's yet
so by your logic you cannot compare a vtec motor to a non vtec either... as it was said earlier.. honda = econobox where as srt4 = performance

 

[6sic6]

Originally posted by brian
srt-4 is not a neon. its a dodge sports car. and whats so bad about driving a neon, expecially when they are nice sleepers, grest suspensions, and look funny owning anything... how are you going to talk about driving a neon.. when you mod the same econobox honda.

dodge did it right, they owning everything for less money.

It's still a neon. It still looks like s**t. It's still gonna get made fun of. They should have put all that work into a whole new car and scrapped the neon.

 

[6sic6]

The only reason so many kids own neons is because they aren't worth anything. Their resale value is s**t. They are indeed s**t. You can make it go fast but, it's still just fast moving s**t.

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by 6sic6
The only reason so many kids own neons is because they aren't worth anything. Their resale value is s**t. They are indeed s**t. You can make it go fast but, it's still just fast moving s**t.

it shares similar body styling to the neon... that is all... the seats are infact scaled down versions of dodge viper seats. and the motor/tranny/turbo/electrical setup is far from being a piece of s**t.

 

[6sic6]

Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
it shares similar body styling to the neon... that is all... the seats are infact scaled down versions of dodge viper seats. and the motor/tranny/turbo/electrical setup is far from being a piece of s**t.

Everything internal could have been changed. It's still a neon. What the f**k does it look like?

 

[2GCIVI]

Why even post that kind of video on this site?

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by 6sic6
Everything internal could have been changed. It's still a neon. What the f**k does it look like?

it's a neon that will woop any honda's ass then if the only reason you have to dislike the car is the fact that it sorta looks like a neon but you know nothing else about the car then you are in need of some education son

 

[Matt]

f**k a Neon SRT4, the car is not built to last. Have any of you ever actually drove in one? They feel f**king cheap as hell. Sure they might be faster then alot of cars in or above thier price range but will they last? Thier qaulity isnt the best.

 

[6sic6]

Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
it's a neon that will woop any honda's ass then if the only reason you have to dislike the car is the fact that it sorta looks like a neon but you know nothing else about the car then you are in need of some education son

I'm not in need of some education, and I'm not your son. I don't care what's inside when it looks like that on the outside. A camaro can whoop a honda big f**kin deal I can't stand what they look like from the 1970 on up. All I'm saying is when it drives down the road unless you know s**t about cars you think it's just another neon. Well, 90% of the people you pull up on don't give a s**t how fast it goes it's a neon.

 

[6sic6]

Originally posted by Mattmob
f**k a Neon SRT4, the car is not built to last. Have any of you ever actually drove in one? They feel f**king cheap as hell. Sure they might be faster then alot of cars in or above thier price range but will they last? Thier qaulity isnt the best.

werd

 

[fast5thgen]

Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
only becuase of it's variable valve timing (vtec) which is another motor in itself... v.v.t./displacement/turbo/supercharger.. diff manufacturers use different technology to gain performance....... honda just hasnt come to the darkside of turbo's yet
so by your logic you cannot compare a vtec motor to a non vtec either... as it was said earlier.. honda = econobox where as srt4 = performance

vtec is not another motor and yes you can compare the 2- turbos and superchargers are forced induction- vtec doesn't increse the pressure of the air it just alows more in- car companies that don't have something like it are just fukin themselves and the consumer for that matter. At this point you have to ask yourself why- why wouldn't you want a car the can get such good gas mileage and still have the potential to make power

by the way Honda has turbo vehicals- and they have been producing turbo powered race engins for years, they even have a turbo fukin wave runner, which I will own sooner or later

 

[$lick Rick]

Originally posted by Mattmob
f**k a Neon SRT4, the car is not built to last. Have any of you ever actually drove in one? They feel f**king cheap as hell. Sure they might be faster then alot of cars in or above thier price range but will they last? Thier qaulity isnt the best.

i've driven several and i was pleasently surprised actually. they need wider wheel/tires but the stock 17's were sorta nice.. and the seats were nice as hell, the boost gauge looked kick ass to