let me guess, democrats just need JiuJitsu?
people used their fists for protection until bad guys started using spears
spears were sufficient until they started using swords and arrows....
swords and arrows fell to guns.
if you could take away the guns, people would go right back to swords and arrows....
you ask a law abiding gun owner and a criminal to give up their guns or face incarceration, the law abiding citizen would give up his gun.... the criminal would say "what gun" then go murder or rob the defenseless citizen
the need to protect ones self will never go away, but taking away ones ability to defend them self will never happen in a free society.
or, simply put, disarming peaceful & law abiding citizens only serves to empower violent criminals
if it had not been for strict anti-gun laws designed to disarm the nazis, hitler would not have been able to kill millions of people without resistance
the government should have no more power than the people choose to give them
the peoples ability to protect themselves should match the governments ability to oppress.
a government that is truly of the people, by the people, and for the people
cannot be above the people in any way