Hey there. You may want to exercise caution whenever someone is too opinionated in either direction about this kind of thing. You know, like when senators rail against prostitution for years on end and then get caught with a tranny in a gas station bathroom.
I'll happily pay for a hotter and cheaper prostitute that will be better. Others can stick with overpaying for their prostitutes that "get the job done" lol.
the racing industry people dont look towards FnF for setups because the FnF developers cater towards street vehicles rather than track.
Im not here boasting FnF or any other company for that matter. They all have their pro's and cons...All of which, i have heard of failing in one way or another on multiple occasions throughout the years, so you're always at risk of being that "one guy who got the s***ty product". Ive been around awhile....if you have, im sure you can remember the days when Progress wasn't the "go to" company for example. Im simply saying that the machines that make these products, and the individuals who inspect them both aren't perfect and there is bound to be mishaps....and also the fact that you can't directly compare one setup to the next because they are not all designed with the same product goals in mind. ie: Spoon sports - endurance and balance, Jun automechanic - max power, and so on. the same applies with suspension.
Direct from F&F's website: "We believe you can perform well on the track and look great doing it.". Besides, the OP mentioned his car would see, and I quote, "A LOT" of track and autox along with street driving. If this is the case, it would only make sense for him to purchase a product that has been proven a million times over to be one of the best setups for motorsports racing AND street use. If he does race, and sometime down the road would want to change his setup, he has that option with rebuildable shocks and Ground-Control offering literally thousands of different springs.
Whether F&F was mentioned or not, this would not affect my suggestion. I've stood by it for years. I'm not going to get butt hurt if someone doesn't choose it, it's their car and they can do what they want. They asked for an opinion, I gave my best. Take it as you want.
OP, or anybody else on this forum, go out to the track and autox events, ask people what suspension they are using and ask what they recommend. I wonder what companies they will mention to you and what they wont..........
That's what I saw.
If any one can find me the 1200 dollar set of progress coilovers for 560... I'll buy them no argument even though I don't like how they adjust ride height. LMA
The Progress CS2 coilovers are the cheapest. You may be looking at their other kit.
$555 shipped for the CS2 from here:
http://www.robearracing.com/pd-progress-cs-ii-series-2-coilovers-civic-integra.cfm
BUT, since you said you wanted pretty stiff springs, this probably isn't the setup you want. Even though it would work just fine for track/autox.