no way that the SRT took the WRX out its impossible. Bullshit
this guy obviously hasnt read a single post on this thread.Originally posted by mugenekpower
no way that the SRT took the WRX out its impossible. Bullshit
uhh no i mean a GS turbo... the 1st gen where known as 16 valve DOHC GS Turbo... i believe 95 was the year they got lazy and just said GST but in essence its the same damn FWD turboOriginally posted by SeanMc300
^^ hell no you dont want a gs turbo....if you do this youll end up with a turbo neon motor. you mean a gst??
is it me or does that seem to happen alotOriginally posted by pop-n-fresh
this guy obviously hasnt read a single post on this thread.
i'm not saying its reliable, but on the same not you cant say it's unreliable since everything in it including the motor and tranny have never been used in this car.. and even if it proves to be unreliable you still wont have to pay a red cent to have it fixed and can sell if you are unhappy with it... but that wont happen. from every person i've talked to and every review i've read, the owners LOVE their cars and wouldnt give them up for anything. and as far as comparing it to the sti.... people all over are comparing it to them... just google it and you'll see. there's nothing on the market for the money that's even close besides the sti and evo.... that's just facts. and i would love to see your hatch beat a srt4. lemme guess... you dumped thousands into an 8 year old car??? aint to smart champ. wait till you try to resale that car and cant get over $5k.Originally posted by eggie75
how do you know that the srt is reliable??? just because its covered under warranty doesn't mean s**t. I used to work for a mazda dealer and you could ask anyone of the rx7 owners and they would tell you that the car is in the shop more than not... the srt has no track record... I don't understand why the comparison to a sti... that wasn't an sti. the sti would blow the s**t out of an srt w/ mods, and its a fookin nice car with alot more stuff to justify the cost diff... liquid injected cooling... omg drool... and besides I know for a fact that my hatchie would leave a srt wondering wtf. not dissin the srt... nice car... but don't compare apples to oranges.
no s**t cause i think we went over that in the first page or 2Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
this guy obviously hasnt read a single post on this thread.
I service a few of them in my shop, they're some of the most reliable fast cars ive seen. We have a crx with a b16a swapped into it that we service and it has close to 200,000 miles without any rebuild to the bottom end. The head was rebuilt recently only because the owner wanted to replace the aging valve seals. Suspension is tight, no sign of low PH on the cooling system (flushed every winter with distilled water) and runs strong. Fluids are maintained on a constant basis, and the car purrs. And 170+ hp in a car that weighs less than 2000lbs is FAST.Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
lemme guess... you dumped thousands into an 8 year old car??? aint to smart champ. wait till you try to resale that car and cant get over $5k.
and anyone is going to be hard pressed to prove to me that an engine swapped honda is going to be more reliable than a brand new srt4.
sti / evo vs srt... not even in the same ball park. maybe a reg wrx. yeah I dumped thousands of dollars into my hatch and I will prob dump thousands more. I'm not looking for something to buy thats fast out of the box... I build my cars for me. not to resell. although I have never raced a srt, you can do the math... my motor comes w/ 210hp on a 2400lb chassis... I have not taken it to the track, but I can guarantee it runs 13's. My heavy ass prelude gets into low 14's and trust me, I know that my civy is hella faster than my prelude. also... 9 times outta 10, a naturally aspirated motor will be more reliable than a forced one. s**t man... if you like the srt so much buy one and take ur ass to mopar land.Originally posted by pop-n-fresh
i'm not saying its reliable, but on the same not you cant say it's unreliable since everything in it including the motor and tranny have never been used in this car.. and even if it proves to be unreliable you still wont have to pay a red cent to have it fixed and can sell if you are unhappy with it... but that wont happen. from every person i've talked to and every review i've read, the owners LOVE their cars and wouldnt give them up for anything. and as far as comparing it to the sti.... people all over are comparing it to them... just google it and you'll see. there's nothing on the market for the money that's even close besides the sti and evo.... that's just facts. and i would love to see your hatch beat a srt4. lemme guess... you dumped thousands into an 8 year old car??? aint to smart champ. wait till you try to resale that car and cant get over $5k.
and anyone is going to be hard pressed to prove to me that an engine swapped honda is going to be more reliable than a brand new srt4.
believe me man, next time i'm in the market for a brand new car and to get $20k into debt i will.Originally posted by eggie75
sti / evo vs srt... not even in the same ball park. maybe a reg wrx. yeah I dumped thousands of dollars into my hatch and I will prob dump thousands more. I'm not looking for something to buy thats fast out of the box... I build my cars for me. not to resell. although I have never raced a srt, you can do the math... my motor comes w/ 210hp on a 2400lb chassis... I have not taken it to the track, but I can guarantee it runs 13's. My heavy ass prelude gets into low 14's and trust me, I know that my civy is hella faster than my prelude. also... 9 times outta 10, a naturally aspirated motor will be more reliable than a forced one. s**t man... if you like the srt so much buy one and take ur ass to mopar land.
i know this but it still holds the import class record. not sure why..... pretty retarded.... but still......Originally posted by Tacoma-Srunner
a ford focus isnt an import.. its FORD.. and i resent that toyota has mistakes with their vehicles!! mine is going strong!