somehow i knew i would find this word in this thread......fanboi...
Oops, sorry brah, I got my dates mixed upTonee, it's not April 1st yet
Warranty, which you won't have once you've touched the engine on your low mileage civic Si, so you spent $17k on a car with zero warranty. And if you don't see the advantage of buying a new car (if you had driven a CRZ you'd know it's umpteen times better to drive than a 7th gen civic) then this is a moot point anyway.I know a 5.0 would be faster, but I kept it in the same brand. That's why I said if someone was a Honda lover. s**t you could buy a one year old, extremely low mileage Si for $17k in my area. That's "new" enough, and with $7k left you could build the engine left. I am comparing very similar cars here.
And why would I test drive one? I have no interest in getting one. It weighs like 100 pounds less than my car, has 7 less horsepower, and gets 4 more MPGs.....these are extremely minimal differences. The incentive to spend four times as much as my car is worth is just NOT there when I am essentially getting a car that the only upside is it reads "0" on the odometer.
key word here is one year old.s**t you could buy a one year old
:d agreedexactly. The gas mileage is nothing spectacular as well. I mean i hate to say it, but most honda's are like this when they are new. Don't get me wrong, i like my honda as a daily driver, and will likely run it into the ground. But it is nothing special. It's comfortable, and gets decent gas mileage. If i can get that from my 7 year old honda, why spend four times as much for 7 less horsepower and 4 extra mpgs?
I bought a CRZ and already swapped in a K24 in it... Fun as f**k!