My buddy's SRT-4 PICS
- Thread starter redcvchtch
- Start date
it would've been higher if it wasn;t for the sae rating and even without it..197 is prettu f**kin impressive are u kiddin???DirtyD said:197 hp from an NA 2.0L 4 isn't that impressive... and Mitsubishi and Dodge were turboing cars wayyyyyyyyyyyy before Fast and the Fruious.
Also, Honda not adding a T option to the Civic somehow makes it true to the game? or more expensive to mod?
100 hp per liter?????????? i'll let it go cause u my boy b***h
I didn't say that I was a baller but civics cost more then neons and also civics have a very good reputation. The only poeple that I know that have neons are poor people. That's just my personal experience. I wasn't trying to insult anybody with my comment but you obviously took it to heart, I don't see why tho since you don't even have a car posted.DirtyD said:Oh, and the poor people thing? you think you've reached baller status because you drive an 02 EX?
Mitsubishi and Dodge might have turbod other cars but not neons and lancers that were just regular 4 cylinder commuter cars.
So I compared a 2005 Civic and a 2005 Neon on KBB just out of curiosity. This is what I got:
Neon Civic
$13,513 $17,028 -that just proves my point that lower income people buy neons
Engine ECB VTEC
Horsepower 132 127 -neons have more horsepower
Civic has a lot of features like ABS brakes, AC, and CD player standard where those things do not come standard with the Neon. Also the Civic has a better rating by JD power, and has a better overall reputation. If I would have to chose between a Neon and a Civic I would go with the Civic.
if u r any type of a genuine car enthusiast u woudl realize that the srt4 is a fast car..rolakers said:
turbo or not its a fast car...
whats ur point abou tthe turbo anyway???
gti got a turbo too..it cost around 30 with options...
mini S got s/c also costs close to 30...
srt4 cost about 24 from the factory and would whoop those cars in a heart beat...sure it would be tough for srt4 to beat the evo and sti for sure from a dig..but it has a good chance from a roll...
stop ur ignorant statements about f**kin poor people...yes they dont have resale value liek civics nor r neons as dependable...but srt4 is hardly a neon.
if u r a car enthusiast stop being f**kin biased just cause KBB told u honda has better value
I do realize that the SRT4 is a fast car, that's not what I was talking about and if you read my previous comments you would know that. But you were too fast to try to get back with a mean ass post instead paying attention to the post.Blazed said:if u r any type of a genuine car enthusiast u woudl realize that the srt4 is a fast car..
turbo or not its a fast car...
whats ur point abou tthe turbo anyway???
gti got a turbo too..it cost around 30 with options...
mini S got s/c also costs close to 30...
srt4 cost about 24 from the factory and would whoop those cars in a heart beat...sure it would be tough for srt4 to beat the evo and sti for sure from a dig..but it has a good chance from a roll...
stop ur ignorant statements about f**kin poor people...yes they dont have resale value liek civics nor r neons as dependable...but srt4 is hardly a neon.
if u r a car enthusiast stop being f**kin biased just cause KBB told u honda has better value
My point is that, just like you said "...yes they dont have resale value liek civics nor r neons as dependable...". I can't help but compare the SRT4 to the regular neons cuz they look the same.
The other thing. I don't think my statements are ignorant because I presented the facts and I drew a conclusion from those facts.
but great entertainment!!!!!!!!Snake_Shit said:
There is no competition. If I wanted to go fast now, sell for SHYT later, I would buy a neon..........err SRT-4.
Honestly though, they HAD to strengthen that motor's internals. EVERY SINGLE NEON MOTOR HAS BLOWN ASS SINCE THE VEHICLES INCEPTION. they are NOTORIOUS for blowing headgaskets like whores blow johns. Those motors are SHYT, sans SRT-4.
The SRT-4 will hold its value A LOT more than the other neons though.
And as much as I dont agree with the way rolakers brought it up, its true. Neons are for poor people. Thats who they market to, the lower class. You can deny it, just like most of you deny a civic is a girls car (mostly girls drive it, and honda markets civics to women), but its true.
YOUR poor people statement was ignorant..rolakers said:
dont even try to deny it..
u can say it or put it however u like..people buy what they want..not what they can afford...
i know a shitload more poor people that drive civics than neoins..so ur points are NULL lmao...u present fact and u draw conclusions..
i saw no graph showing ho wmany poor people in the world drive neons as oposed to civics???
and u dont notice the difference between a neon and srt4..well then i would have to say ur blind..because there are clearly a lot of physical difference from the front to back to thru the grill and under the hood and the interior...EVERYTHING....
ur jumping from neons ot srt4's..
i can gurantee u the value of srt4's will hold much better than civics...
go look that up...with ur 130hp beast of a resale value monster civic...
fo sho, dodge has been doing it for a LONG time, hence the 87 dodge caravan that my buddy has that runs mid 13's, or the omni that he has in the 11's, honda choice to not turbo is just that THEIR choice. sure i'd rather have my civic over a neon but thats just because of the styling aspect because i didn't choose it for speedDirtyD said:197 hp from an NA 2.0L 4 isn't that impressive... and Mitsubishi and Dodge were turboing cars wayyyyyyyyyyyy before Fast and the Fruious.
Also, Honda not adding a T option to the Civic somehow makes it true to the game? or more expensive to mod?
Blazed said:it would've been higher if it wasn;t for the sae rating and even without it..197 is prettu f**kin impressive are u kiddin???
100 hp per liter?????????? i'll let it go cause u my boy b***h
What I meant was Honda's been doing that for what 7 years now, with their dual cams?
It's nothing THAT new..
... and yeah, that whole poor people statement was very ignorant. Driving a Civic doesn't exactly put you above any of the other econo boxes on the street
rolakers said:
...
ok now lets do another comparison...
....
whats your point?
the poor people driving neons is just flat out ignorant
your friends SRT-4 looks great
$lick Rick
TEOTWAWKI
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
O_o
Best post in this thread EVAR........$lick Rick said:
ShinsenTuner
CC's Youngest OG
Registered VIP
Registered OG
5+ Year Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
how are you so positive that SRT4's arent dependable.................? OEM turbo upgrade options UNDER factory warrenty and a 21K brand new price is what everyone would want... 197hp for 23+ is pretty out there.rolakers said:
SilentMist
10 psi seems like a dream
I must stand up and speak being my brother own`s an srt-4 with stage 1 turbo upgrade :-D ,I dont know why anyone would say these bad boys are slow man,I have tooken my brother srt-4 out many a night to go beat down on some stang`s :-D and it like taking candy from a baby now that he did his turbo upgrade to stage 1 the little monster machine is pulling on evo`s now being yes it is actually neon because the body are the same but the engine have no match come on its not a poor people car it was made for those who wanted to go fast now the cheap and easy way now,i`ve heard that they start to break alot at around 80,000 miles but,I cant verify that to me the srt-4 is the s**t man ,I wouldnt mind owning one at all that thing is a monster straight from factory.
decent neon.