I hate the internet...oc_civic said:vague words bother me... "moderate to severe" im sure there are instances where the accident itself is "moderate to severe" but due to the way the cars hit, the belts may not need to be replaced.. like getting hit from behind JUST AN EXAMPLE.. i do howevere understand the point.. if the belts are f**ked up replace them.. that obviously makes sense.. but again i totally admit i did NOT know that they stretched..
Yeah, obviously if you get rear ended, chances are the belts arent damaged (however the pendulum may be but thats another thread entirely lol) Again, I thought that was a GIVEN and didnt need to be explained.
Bottom line: If you show damage on the belts, they need replaced.
it was never an argument.. it was a discussion...hooked_on4 said:and are we done w/the stretch arguement yet?