DigitalShift said:
To be honest with you, I really dont care for what you have to say. I dont know where you think you are, but this is a Civic forum. I dont get it... what car do you drive? Do you own an Evolution? STi? Skyline?? Do you own an almighty super tuner car? I dont care what you have, you obviously beleive whatever you want regardless of facts. Are you that ignorant to think someone paid $10,000 for a car thats 9 years old? Please! I paid a little over $1700 for this car in stock form. I'll tell you right now that the total cost of the car you see in these picutres was around $15-16k. Thats CHEAPER and FASTER than ANYTHING you can buy from a dealership.
So that's your car. can joe schmoe without connections build that exact thing for the same price with labor? no. do you think you've accomplished something grande? your car is awesome, i love it, but stop being a f**king ricer. 15 grand? you think you can't go to some random performance shop and ask them what they can do with 15grand? please. and when did i say they paid 10k for a car? i said that was the price NEW
but then, what do you care about what i have to say? it's not like you'd take the time to keep writing back to me. me, i don't care.. this helps pass the time at work since they've blocked most of my regular sites, like crsx.
DigitalShift said:
Evolution IX ??? Who cares what Evo it is..lol You say it hits 12s stock, soooooo what? A K powered hatch will break 12s too and thats WITHOUT the traction the AWD has.
i have yet to see a k-powered hatch break 12s without further mods to the k20a. just the swap won't cut it. suspension, bolt ons, chassis work (stripping, reinforcement, whatever), slicks, sure, i'll believe that.. but don't get it twisted: a simple swap will not put that car into the 12s by itself.
yeah, a stock car that can hit 12's and has much more potential for power and handling is soooooo much worse of a tuner car than a car that is completely stripped, fwd, with a complete engine/tranny swap... for the money you've put into it (which factors to be about 12-13k, minus the cost of car), you'd better be in the looooow 11's. otherwise, what's the point? cost of car is a bullshit argument and everyone knows that. keep dreaming the ricer dream bro. i can't imagine where some cars would be with 12-13k put into them... hell, a 240sx would make it cry, and you can get one of those things for virtually nothing.
and roughly, the power differences of evos:
2003-2004 evo8 = dynos about ~220-230whp
2005 evo8 (and evo 8.5) = dynos about ~245whp
2006 evo9 = dynos about ~270whp
so yeah, there's a pretty significant difference between each... and they're more apparent when you start modding.
DigitalShift said:
But if you are going to doubt me and what I say, please do not post anymore in my thread.
By the way, the 290whp figure wasnt from IPS. It's from a Europen company... I dont have to prove anything, call them up and ask them.
you roll your eyes more than chicks that can't find a tampon. you said ips dyno'd it... i don't see the dyno. so for all the crap you talk, you haven't shown s**t. and i doubt you, because you haven't proven s**t.. you said that for those few bolt ons some company was dynoing over 290whp. you've gotta be f**king crazy to believe that. maybe with a stroker kit, race gas, optimal conditions, blah blah blah, i'd believe it.